Measurement Methods for Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure: a Review

Didace Ndahimana; Eun-Kyung Kim

doi:10.7762/cnr.2017.6.2.68

Articles

Page Path

Review Article

Measurement Methods for Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure: a Review

Didace Ndahimana

, Eun-Kyung Kim

Clinical Nutrition Research 2017;6(2):68-80.
Published online: April 28, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7762/cnr.2017.6.2.68

Department of Food and Nutrition, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung 25457, Korea.

Correspondence to Eun-Kyung Kim. Department of Food and Nutrition, Gangneung-Wonju National University, 7 Jukheon-gil, Gangneung 25457, Korea. Tel: +82-33-640-2336, Fax: +82-33-640-2330, ekkim@gwnu.ac.kr

• Received: April 14, 2017 • Revised: April 17, 2017 • Accepted: April 19, 2017

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

17 Views
0 Download
122 Crossref

Full Article

Download PDF

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
COMPONENTS OF TEE
DOUBLY LABELED WATER (DLW) METHOD
DIRECT CALORIMETRY
INDIRECT CALORIMETRY
ACCELEROMETRY
HEART RATE MONITOR
PEDOMETRY
SELF-REPORT METHODS
CONCLUSION
NOTES
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Physical activity is defined as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that results in energy expenditure. The benefits of physical activity for health maintenance have been well documented, especially in the prevention and management of chronic diseases. Therefore, accurate measurement of physical activity and energy expenditure is essential both for epidemiological studies and in the clinical context. Given the large number of available methods, it is important to have an understanding of each, especially when one needs to choose a technique to use. The purpose of this review was to discuss the components of total energy expenditure and present advantage and limitations of different methods of physical activity and energy expenditure assessment.
Keywords: Physical activity; Energy expenditure; Methods

INTRODUCTION

The benefits of physical activity for health maintenance have been well documented, especially in the prevention and management of chronic diseases such as some cancers, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. In this context, accurate measurement of physical activity and energy expenditure is essential both in epidemiological studies and in assessment of intervention programs' efficacy [6]. In clinical setting, assessment of energy expenditure allows to estimate nutrient requirements for patients during nutrition support [7].

Physical activity is defined as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that results in energy expenditure [8]. It is important to emphasize that the physical activity and energy expenditure are 2 different concepts. Simply stated, physical activity is a behavior that results in an elevation of energy expenditure above resting levels [9]. Total energy expenditure (TEE) refers to the total amount of energy expended during a 24-hour period, and it contains 3 main components: resting energy expenditure (REE), thermic effect of food (TEF), and activity energy expenditure (AEE) [10].

Various methods exist for assessing physical activity and energy expenditure, and each of them has advantages and limitations as summarized in Table 1 [6]. Understanding of these methods is important to decide which method to use for the specific study context. The purpose of this review was to discuss the components of TEE and present different methods of physical activity and energy expenditure assessment, with emphasis on each method's advantages and limitations.

Table 1

Advantages and limitations of different methods for physical activity and energy expenditure measurement

Table 1
Methods	Advantages	Limitations
DLW	• Highly accurate method, considered a gold standard for the measurement of TEE.	• High cost of the method (including the high price of DLW and expensive equipment for analysis).
	• Allows freedom of activity to participants.	• Expertise required for the personnel.
	• Allows freedom of activity to participants.	• The method does not provide any specific details on physical activity.
Direct calorimetry	• It is the most accurate method for quantifying the metabolic rate.	• High cost of the method.
Direct calorimetry		• Subject confinement required for 24 hr or more.
Indirect calorimetry	• Accurate and non-invasive method.	• Relatively high cost.
	• Provides information on the metabolic fuels being combusted.	• Trained personnel needed for the method's correct use.
	• Allows the assessment of energy expenditure in the field environment.	• Trained personnel needed for the method's correct use.
Accelerometry	• Objective measurement of physical activity.	• Inaccuracy of predictive equations to translate activity counts into energy expenditure, especially when used across a range of various activities.
	• Can be used both in laboratory and field settings.
	• Non-invasive method and less burdensome to subjects.
	• Relatively inexpensive.
Heart rate monitor	• Objective tool for the measurement of physical activity and energy expenditure.	• Inaccurate in measuring sedentary and light activities.
	• Relatively low cost.	• Electrical or magnetic interference from common electrical devices.
	• Noninvasive and versatile method.
	• Can be used both in controlled settings and in free living conditions.
Pedometry	• Inexpensive and non-invasive method.	• Limited to measuring only walking activity.
	• Used to assess the most common activity (walking).	• Inaccurate for assessing the distance covered and energy expended.
	• Can motivate people to maintain physical activity.
Self-report methods	• Low cost, allowing their use in studies with large sample size.	• Low accuracy and reliability, especially linked with their dependency on the participant's memory.
	• Low burden to subjects.
	• Provide information on physical activity patterns.

DLW, doubly labeled water; TEE, total energy expenditure.

COMPONENTS OF TEE

REE

The REE, the largest portion of TEE, is the energy required to maintain the basic metabolic activities including maintaining the body temperature and keeping the functioning of vital organs such as the brain, the kidneys, the heart, and the lungs. REE is defined as the energy expended by a fasting person at rest, in a thermo-neutral environment. Factors most significantly affecting the REE include body composition, gender, body temperature, age, energy restriction, and genetics and endocrine system [10]. A brief description of selected factors is presented here: (1) Body composition: fat-free mass (also called lean body mass) is the primary determinant of REE, meaning that high fat-free mass individual having higher REE [11]; (2) Gender: REE tends to be higher in males than in females [12, 13], and this may be due to the higher percentage of lean body mass in males compared to females [10, 14]; (3) Age: older individuals have lower REE compared to younger people [15]. The age-related decline in REE has been shown to be independent from changes in body composition, suggesting that additional metabolic changes may also be involved [15, 16]; and (4) Energy restriction: efforts to lose weight by restricting energy intake lead to a decrease in REE [17]. This phenomenon may explain the difficulty to maintain weight loss by low calorie diets, which is associated with the biological response to energy restriction [18].

The REE is measured when the fasting person is resting in a comfortable environment. The fasting time is usually about 2 to 4 hours [19]. REE is slightly higher (about 10%) than the basal energy expenditure (BEE), which is the lowest energy expenditure of person and measurement of BEE requires more stringent conditions. A person's BEE is determined when individual is in a post absorptive state (i.e., no food intake for at least 12 hours), is lying down (supine), and is completely relaxed (motionless)—preferably very shortly after awakening from sleep in the morning [19].

AEE

The AEE is the most variable among the components of TEE, both at the intrapersonal and interpersonal level. In sedentary people, it can account for less than half of BEE while it can be as high as 1 to 2 times the BEE or more in case of very active people such as some athletes or heavy laborers [20]. Factors that influence AEE include intensity, duration, and frequency of activity [6].

TEF

The TEF, also referred to as diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT), is the energy required for the food digestion, absorption, transport and metabolism, storage of nutrients, and elimination of wastes. It represents increase in energy expenditure above the REE, which can be measured for several hours after a meal. The TEF is estimated as about 10% of the daily TEE [10].

DOUBLY LABELED WATER (DLW) METHOD

Principle of the method

The DLW method uses stable isotopes of oxygen (¹⁸O) and hydrogen (²H) for the measurement of TEE. The DLW method is widely recognized as the gold standard for the measurement of TEE [21], and has been used in various studies to validate other methods [22, 23]. In addition to its high accuracy [24], the DLW method presents the advantage of its noninvasive nature and possibility for the subjects to continue their normal activities during the measurement period. The method also has a limited burden on subjects [25]. However, limitation of the method is its high cost due to the high price of DLW, the expensive equipment and expertise required for analysis [21]. Another limitation of the DLW technique is that it provides the overall measure of averaged daily TEE over the measurement period, but it does not provide any specific details on physical activity. Currently, this method has been used in a wide range of population categories including infants [26, 27], pregnant and lactating women [28, 29], and the elderly [23, 30].

The method is based on the following principle: after the subject ingests a dose of ²H₂¹⁸O, there is an equilibration of the 2 isotopes with total body water (TBW) followed by their elimination from the body, which occurs at different rates. Deuterium (²H) is lost from the body via only water (H₂O) while ¹⁸O is lost both via water and carbon dioxide (CO₂). The rate of CO₂ production (rCO₂) is calculated as the difference between the elimination rates of ²H and ¹⁸O, using the following formula [31]:

rCO₂ (mol/day) = 0.4554 × TBW (mol) × (1.007 k_o − 1.041 k_h)

where k_o and k_h (day^-1) are the elimination rates of ²H and ¹⁸O, respectively.

The TEE is calculated by using the modified version of Weir's formula based on rCO₂ and food quotient (FQ) [31]:

TEE (kcal/day) = 22.4 × (3.9 × [rCO₂/FQ] + 1.1 × rCO₂)

Protocol of the DLW method

There are 2 basic protocols for the DLW method: the 2 point and the multi-point approaches. The 2-point protocol as the minimal form requires 3 specimens including a pre-dose baseline, a post-dose specimen taken on the day of dosing after the isotopes have equilibrated throughout the body, and a final specimen taken at the end of the study (that is, at day 10–14). The multi-point protocol as the most extreme form generally involves the steps taking a pre-dose baseline specimen and specimens every day after intake of the dose until the end of the sampling period. In practice, the 2 approaches have been modifications in the 2 approaches and they are quite similar [25].

Concerning the 2-point protocol, the most commonly used form is the modified approach in which a total of 5 samples are collected [13, 32, 33]. Subjects are requested to come to the clinical site or urine sample collection center in the morning after an overnight fast, and the protocol begins by collecting the baseline urine sample. A short time after, the participant drinks the DLW prepared based on the subject's TBW [13, 32, 33]. In some studies, the amount of isotope dose in DLW was determined by the participant's body weight [31, 34, 35]. One hour after drinking the DLW, subjects should void to empty the bladder and the time must be recorded. However, this urine is not collected since the isotope equilibrium with the body water is not yet established at this time. Three and 4 hours after drinking the DLW, 2 more urine samples should be collected. The subject should not drink and eat between the 3 to 4 hours during urine sample collections to minimize any short-term effect of water intake on urine enrichment. On the final day of experimental period, 2 more urine samples should be collected at about the same time of the day before. Typical intervals between the initial and the final urine collections are 7, 10, or 14 days [25]. In the multi-point approach, more urine samples are collected after DLW administration than those in the 2-point protocol [34, 35, 36]. During the study period, all samples must be collect at similar time to the previous days.

The number of urine samples collected is not a critical consideration with regard to the validity of the DLW technique. Rather, the choice of sampling frequency depends on the investigator's preference for precision of the method [25]. The 2-point protocol presents an advantage of using fewer samples, and provides the more exact estimate of TEE under conditions in which there is day to day variation in energy expenditure or water turnover. On the other hand, the multi-point protocol has the advantage of data averaging and thus minimizes the analytical error. In addition, it allows the investigator to assess the differences in energy expenditure for sub-periods within the metabolic period [25]. After urine samples collection and storage, analysis is performed by the isotope-ratio mass spectrometry method [25].

The dose of DLW

The dose of DLW is based on the body size of subject in order to match the body water enrichments to the isotope-ratio mass spectrometry precision. Considering the difficulty of measuring TBW, it must be estimated. In most DLW studies, investigators have assumed TBW as 60% of body weight. The 99 atom % deuterium (²H) and 10 atom % ¹⁸O are the most commonly used for enrichments of the labeled water available on the market. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) recommends doses of 0.12 g·kg⁻¹ body water of 99 atom % deuterium labeled water and 1.80 g·kg⁻¹ body water of 10 atom % ¹⁸O. When the more highly enriched ¹⁸O water is used, the dose should be reduced [25]. Prior to the administration, the DLW can be sterilized by pushing it through a 0.22 μm filter.

Calculation of AEE and physical activity level (PAL)

After its measurement by the DLW method, TEE can be used for the calculation of AEE and PAL. The calculations involve REE, which is measured by indirect calorimetry [37] or estimated by using predictive equations [38]. With the TEF assumed as 10% of TEE, the AEE is calculated as follow [6]:

AEE (kcal/day) = 0.9 × TEE (kcal/day) − REE (kcal/day)

The following equation is used for the calculation of PAL:

PAL = TEE/REE

DIRECT CALORIMETRY

The direct calorimetry technique measures the rate of heat loss by the subject using a calorimeter. It is the most accurate method for quantifying metabolic rate [39], but its use is limited by the high cost. There are 4 types of direct calorimeters, namely the “isothermal direct calorimeters” (also known as “heat-flow or heat-conduction calorimeters”) [40] which work by maintaining a constant wall temperature by means of a constant temperature fluid (commonly water) in a jacket or bath surrounding the animal chamber, or in a network of copper tubing bonded to an exterior wall surface; the “heat sink direct calorimeters” which are made of a chamber from which heat lost by the subject is removed by a liquid-cooled heat exchanger [41]; the “direct convection calorimeters” which consist of an insulated chamber ventilated with an air flow at a known rate. The system works by determining the temperature and enthalpy differences between the air entering and exiting an insulated chamber [42, 43]; and the “direct differential calorimeters” which involve 2 identical chambers, one housing the subject and the other having an electric heater adjusted to yield identical temperature increases in both chambers [39].

INDIRECT CALORIMETRY

The technique of indirect calorimetry relies on the measurement of inspired and expired gas volume, and the concentrations of O₂ and CO₂ [37]. Various methods are used for gas collection, including the Douglas Bag [44], the canopy [45], and the face mask [37, 46]. Indirect calorimetry is an accurate and noninvasive method, and it can allow the assessment of energy expenditure on field through the use of ambulatory metabolic systems [47]. Energy expenditure is calculated by Weir's formula [48] which is as follow:

Energy expenditure (kcal) = 3.941 × VO₂ (L) + 1.106 × VCO₂ (L)

where VO₂ is the volume of consumed O₂ and VCO₂ is the volume of produced CO₂.

In case of REE calculation, the abbreviated Weir's formula [48, 49] is mostly used:

REE (kcal/day) = (3.941 × VO₂ [L/min] + 1.106 × VCO₂ [L/min]) × 1,440

where VO₂ is the volume of consumed O₂ and VCO₂ is the volume of produced CO₂.

Indirect calorimetry is the most widely used method to assess energy balance, including those involving patients in clinical setting [50, 51]. In other studies, it has served as a reference method to assess the accuracy of other methods of energy expenditure measurement, such as the validation of accelerometers [52] or predictive equations for REE [53, 54]. In comparison to the direct calorimetry, the method is more affordable, and presents the advantage of providing information on the metabolic fuels being combusted in addition to measuring the metabolic rate [39].

ACCELEROMETRY

Recent advances in technology have permitted the development of accelerometers as one of the methods of physical activity energy and expenditure measurement. These tools have proven to be reliable, objective, less burdening to participants, versatile and less costly compared to other methods of physical activity energy estimation [55]. Today, different models of accelerometers have been developed by different companies, and are available on the market. Their detailed specifications have been described elsewhere [56]. For the Actigraph accelerometer and Actical accelerometer models, different generations have been developed over time as described in a study by John and Freedson [57].

This method is based on measurement of the body's acceleration, which is the change of velocity over time and is expressed in terms of multiples of gravitational force (g = 9.8 m/S²) [6]. Certain models measure acceleration in 1 plane (uniaxial), 2 planes (biaxial), or 3 planes (triaxial accelerometers). Accelerometers generate their output in form of “counts” per unit time. To convert these counts in energy expenditure units, predictive equations have been developed. Some of equations permit to calculate energy expenditure as metabolic equivalents (METs) [58, 59, 60] or kcal/min [60, 61]. Validation studies for these equations have been conducted using indirect calorimetry [52] or the DLW method [23, 62]. In a recent study, Lyden et al. [63] evaluated the accuracy of commonly used accelerometer equations for the prediction of energy expenditure and METs. Their findings indicated that current accelerometer prediction equations have many limitations when translating accelerometer counts to energy expenditure, especially when used across a range of various activities.

The first Actigraph models developed are uniaxial accelerometer [60] and recently, new models have been developed which measure acceleration in 3 planes (triaxial accelerometers) [64]. In these latter models, energy expenditure can be calculated by integration of counts from the 3 planes, namely the vertical (Y), the horizontal right-left (X) and the horizontal front-back axis (Z) [64]. In this case, energy expenditure is predicted by what is known as vector magnitude (VM).

VM=X2+Y2+Z2

Where X, Y, and Z are the sum of counts from X-axis, Y-axis, and Z-axis, respectively.

One of the questions that have been raised with the development of new generations of accelerometers is the comparability between their output and the previous generations. It has been shown that there is comparability between uniaxial and triaxial generations of the same accelerometer model when counts from the vertical axis are used, but this is not applicable in case the VM counts from the triaxial accelerometer are used [65].

HEART RATE MONITOR

Heart rate monitors are among commonly used objective tools for measuring physical activity and energy expenditure [66, 67]. Their use is based on the assumed relationship among heart rate, activity intensity and oxygen consumption since physical activity puts the heart under pressure to deliver more oxygen to exercising muscle cells [68]. Studies have established that heart rate changes proportionally with activity intensity and oxygen consumption in moderate to vigorous physical activities [69]. However, this correlation is low in case of sedentary and light activities, and it remains one of the limitations of heart rate monitors [68, 70, 71]. The relationship between heart rate and VO₂ is affected by confounding factors such as specific muscle mass utilization, type of activity, physical fitness levels, and other exercise-related factors [6]. Some non-exercise factors have also been reported to affect the relationship between heart rate and VO₂. Studies have reported electrical or magnetic interference with the heart rate measurements by devices such as computers, microwaves, televisions, and motorized exercise equipment, leading to unstable readings and data loss [72]. Suggestions to reduce this problem of electrical interference include keeping the heart rate monitor at least 1 meter away from the electrical circuit of electrical devices, and to position the heart rate receiver close to the transmitter, thus strengthening the transmitter signal relative to the interference signal [6].

Despite these limitations, heart rate monitors remain popular among researchers as they present advantages of relatively low cost, noninvasive nature and versatility. Their use provides the objective and reliable information on energy expenditure and intensity and duration of activity [69, 73, 74]. Different studies have shown validity of these tools in controlled settings [69, 75] as well as in free living conditions [76, 77].

PEDOMETRY

Pedometers are used in the measurement of walking, which is one of the most frequently performed activities and contributes a large proportion of physical AEE on physical activity questionnaires and logs [6]. The basic output of pedometers is in form of step counts. In addition to this, it is possible to use pedometers for estimating the distance traveled by multiplying the number of steps by stride length. Stride length is affected by factors including walking speed, height, age, and gender [78]. Some pedometers display energy expenditure as kilocalorie [79], but it is not clear whether they display gross or net kilocalories. Crouter et al. [79] assessed the validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost, and found that these tools are the most accurate for assessing steps, less accurate for assessing distance, and even less accurate for assessing kilocalories. In spite of their low accuracy, pedometers have an advantage of low cost, and they can be used as self-monitoring tools for people who want to maintain their PAL [80, 81].

SELF-REPORT METHODS

The most widely used self-report methods for assessment of physical activities include methods such as physical activity questionnaires and physical activity records and diaries. They have been used in large cohort studies, which have allowed establishing the protective role of physical activity against diseases including metabolic syndrome-related disorders (insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and obesity), heart and pulmonary diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary heart disease, chronic heart failure, and intermittent claudication), muscle, bone and joint diseases (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, fibromyalgia, and chronic fatigue syndrome), cancer, depression, asthma and type 1 diabetes [82]. The limitation of these self-report methods of physical activity assessment is their low accuracy and reliability [83], as shown by various validation studies using objective measures of physical activity or energy expenditure such as the DLW method [84] and accelerometers [85, 86]. Nevertheless, they are more affordable due to low cost compared to other method of physical activity assessment. They provide information concerning the participants' physical activity patterns [6].

The most commonly used physical activity questionnaires include the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [87, 88], the 7-day Physical Activity Recall (PAR) [30], the Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (MAQ) [89], the Previous Week Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (PWMAQ) [90], the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) [91], and the Previous Day Physical Activity Recall (PDPAR) [92]. Details on these questionnaires are provided elsewhere [93]. These questionnaires present a low burden to subjects, but they are limited by their relying on the participant's memory of performed physical activities, increasing the risk of memory bias [6]. Since physical activity records and diaries require participants to record performed activities, they minimize the memory bias in case they are completed on time. However, the burden to participants is higher compared to physical activity questionnaires and the delay to record may lead to memory bias and reactivity [93].

CONCLUSION

In summary, there is no single best method that can assess all aspects of physical activity and energy expenditure. Therefore, as suggested by Troiano [94], the choice of assessment instrument depends on what aspect of physical activity the researcher wants to measure, characteristics of the target population, and whether the data will be used to describe groups or individuals.

NOTES

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

REFERENCES

1. Low WY, Lee YK, Samy AL. Non-communicable diseases in the Asia-Pacific region: prevalence, risk factors and community-based prevention. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2015;28:20-26.
Article
PubMed
2. Beavis AL, Smith AJ, Fader AN. Lifestyle changes and the risk of developing endometrial and ovarian cancers: opportunities for prevention and management. Int J Womens Health 2016;8:151-167.
PubMed
PMC
3. Kirkham AA, Davis MK. Exercise prevention of cardiovascular disease in breast cancer survivors. J Oncol 2015;2015:917606.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
4. Hamasaki H. Daily physical activity and type 2 diabetes: a review. World J Diabetes 2016;7:243-251.
PubMed
PMC
5. Alves AJ, Viana JL, Cavalcante SL, Oliveira NL, Duarte JA, Mota J, Oliveira J, Ribeiro F. Physical activity in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: overview updated. World J Cardiol 2016;8:575-583.
Article
PubMed
PMC
6. Welk GJ. Physical activity assessments for health-related research. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 2002.
7. Rolfes SR, Pinna K, Whitney EN. Understanding normal and clinical nutrition. 9th ed. Belmont (CA): Wadsworth, Cengage Learning; 2012.
8. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep 1985;100:126-131.
PubMed
PMC
9. Pinheiro Volp AC, Esteves de Oliveira FC, Duarte Moreira Alves R, Esteves EA, Bressan J. Energy expenditure: components and evaluation methods. Nutr Hosp 2011;26:430-440.
PubMed
10. Nelms M, Sucher KP, Lacey K, Roth SL. Nutrition therapy and pathophysiology. 2nd ed. Belmont (CA): Wadsworth, Cengage Learning; 2011.
11. Sparti A, DeLany JP, de la Bretonne JA, Sander GE, Bray GA. Relationship between resting metabolic rate and the composition of the fat-free mass. Metabolism 1997;46:1225-1230.
PubMed
12. de la Torre CL, Ramírez-Marrero FA, Martínez LR, Nevárez C. Predicting resting energy expenditure in healthy Puerto Rican adults. J Am Diet Assoc 2010;110:1523-1526.
Article
PubMed
13. Tooze JA, Schoeller DA, Subar AF, Kipnis V, Schatzkin A, Troiano RP. Total daily energy expenditure among middle-aged men and women: the OPEN Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;86:382-387.
Article
PubMed
14. Webb P. Energy expenditure and fat-free mass in men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 1981;34:1816-1826.
Article
PubMed
15. Frisard MI, Broussard A, Davies SS, Roberts LJ 2nd, Rood J, de Jonge L, Fang X, Jazwinski SM, Deutsch WA, Ravussin E; Louisiana Healthy Aging Study. Aging, resting metabolic rate, and oxidative damage: results from the Louisiana Healthy Aging Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007;62:752-759.
PubMed
16. Krems C, Lührmann PM, Strassburg A, Hartmann B, Neuhäuser-Berthold M. Lower resting metabolic rate in the elderly may not be entirely due to changes in body composition. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005;59:255-262.
Article
PubMed
PDF
17. Martin CK, Heilbronn LK, de Jonge L, DeLany JP, Volaufova J, Anton SD, Redman LM, Smith SR, Ravussin E. Effect of calorie restriction on resting metabolic rate and spontaneous physical activity. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007;15:2964-2973.
Article
PubMed
18. Maclean PS, Bergouignan A, Cornier MA, Jackman MR. Bioliology's response to dieting: the impetus for weight regain. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2011;301:R581-R600.
PubMed
PMC
19. Gropper SA, Smith JL. Advanced nutrition and human metabolism. 6th ed. Belmont (CA): Wadsworth, Cengage Learning; 2013.
20. Institute of Medicine, Panel on Macronutrients (US). Institute of Medicine, Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes (US). Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2002.
21. Park J, Kazuko IT, Kim E, Kim J, Yoon J. Estimating free-living human energy expenditure: practical aspects of the doubly labeled water method and its applications. Nutr Res Pract 2014;8:241-248.
PubMed
PMC
22. Ndahimana D, Lee SH, Kim YJ, Son HR, Ishikawa-Takata K, Park J, Kim EK. Accuracy of dietary reference intake predictive equation for estimated energy requirements in female tennis athletes and non-athlete college students: comparison with the doubly labeled water method. Nutr Res Pract 2017;11:51-56.
Article
PubMed
PDF
23. Colbert LH, Matthews CE, Havighurst TC, Kim K, Schoeller DA. Comparative validity of physical activity measures in older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;43:867-876.
Article
PubMed
PMC
24. Wong WW, Roberts SB, Racette SB, Das SK, Redman LM, Rochon J, Bhapkar MV, Clarke LL, Kraus WE. The doubly labeled water method produces highly reproducible longitudinal results in nutrition studies. J Nutr 2014;144:777-783.
Article
PubMed
PMC
25. International Atomic Energy Agency (AT). Assessment of body composition and total energy expenditure in humans using stable isotope techniques. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2009.
26. Gondolf UH, Tetens I, Hills AP, Michaelsen KF, Trolle E. Validation of a pre-coded food record for infants and young children. Eur J Clin Nutr 2012;66:91-96.
PubMed
27. Jones PJ, Winthrop AL, Schoeller DA, Swyer PR, Smith J, Filler RM, Heim T. Validation of doubly labeled water for assessing energy expenditure in infants. Pediatr Res 1987;21:242-246.
Article
PubMed
28. Butte NF, Wong WW, Treuth MS, Ellis KJ, O'Brian Smith E. Energy requirements during pregnancy based on total energy expenditure and energy deposition. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:1078-1087.
Article
PubMed
29. Butte NF, King JC. Energy requirements during pregnancy and lactation. Public Health Nutr 2005;8:1010-1027.
Article
PubMed
30. Calabro MA, Kim Y, Franke WD, Stewart JM, Welk GJ. Objective and subjective measurement of energy expenditure in older adults: a doubly labeled water study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2015;69:850-855.
PubMed
31. St-Onge MP, Roberts AL, Chen J, Kelleman M, O'Keeffe M. RoyChoudhury A, Jones PJ. Short sleep duration increases energy intakes but does not change energy expenditure in normal-weight individuals. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;94:410-416.
PubMed
PMC
32. Cooper JA, Manini TM, Paton CM, Yamada Y, Everhart JE, Cummings S, Mackey DC, Newman AB, Glynn NW, Tylavsky F, Harris T, Schoeller DA. Health ABC study. Longitudinal change in energy expenditure and effects on energy requirements of the elderly. Nutr J 2013;12:73.
PubMed
PMC
33. Trabulsi J, Troiano RP, Subar AF, Sharbaugh C, Kipnis V, Schatzkin A, Schoeller DA. Precision of the doubly labeled water method in a large-scale application: evaluation of a streamlined-dosing protocol in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003;57:1370-1377.
Article
PubMed
PDF
34. Zhuo Q, Sun R, Gou LY, Piao JH, Liu JM, Tian Y, Zhang YH, Yang XG. Total energy expenditure of 16 Chinese young men measured by the doubly labeled water method. Biomed Environ Sci 2013;26:413-420.
PubMed
35. Butte NF, Wong WW, Wilson TA, Adolph AL, Puyau MR, Zakeri IF. Revision of Dietary Reference Intakes for energy in preschool-age children. Am J Clin Nutr 2014;100:161-167.
Article
PubMed
PMC
36. Salazar G, Vásquez F, Rodríguez MP, Andrade AM, Anziani MA, Vio F, Coward W. Energy expenditure and intake comparisons in Chilean children 4–5 years attending day-care centres. Nutr Hosp 2015;32:1067-1074.
PubMed
37. Leonard WR. Laboratory and field methods for measuring human energy expenditure. Am J Hum Biol 2012;24:372-384.
Article
PubMed
38. Frankenfield D, Roth-Yousey L, Compher C. Comparison of predictive equations for resting metabolic rate in healthy nonobese and obese adults: a systematic review. J Am Diet Assoc 2005;105:775-789.
PubMed
39. Kaiyala KJ, Ramsay DS. Direct animal calorimetry, the underused gold standard for quantifying the fire of life. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 2011;158:252-264.
Article
PubMed
40. Zhang WS. Construction, calibration and testing of a decimeter-size heat-flow calorimeter. Thermochim Acta 2010;499:128-132.
Article
41. Webster JD, Welsh G, Pacy P, Garrow JS. Description of a human direct calorimeter, with a note on the energy cost of clerical work. Br J Nutr 1986;55:1-6.
Article
PubMed
42. Levine JA. Measurement of energy expenditure. Public Health Nutr 2005;8:1123-1132.
PubMed
43. Snellen JW, Chang KS, Smith W. Technical description and performance characteristics of a human whole-body calorimeter. Med Biol Eng Comput 1983;21:9-20.
Article
PubMed
PDF
44. Hopker JG, Jobson SA, Gregson HC, Coleman D, Passfield L. Reliability of cycling gross efficiency using the Douglas bag method. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012;44:290-296.
Article
PubMed
45. Horner NK, Lampe JW, Patterson RE, Neuhouser ML, Beresford SA, Prentice RL. Indirect calorimetry protocol development for measuring resting metabolic rate as a component of total energy expenditure in free-living postmenopausal women. J Nutr 2001;131:2215-2218.
Article
PubMed
46. National Guideline Clearinghouse (US). Energy expenditure: measuring resting metabolic rate (RMR) in the healthy and non-critically ill evidence-based nutrition practice guideline. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.
47. Schrack JA, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L. Comparison of the Cosmed K4b(2) portable metabolic system in measuring steady-state walking energy expenditure. PLoS One 2010;5:e9292.
PubMed
PMC
48. Weir JB. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol 1949;109:1-9.
Article
PubMed
PMC
49. Walker RN, Heuberger RA. Predictive equations for energy needs for the critically ill. Respir Care 2009;54:509-521.
PubMed
50. Picolo MF, Lago AF, Menegueti MG, Nicolini EA, Basile-Filho A, Nunes AA, Martins-Filho OA, Auxiliadora-Martins M. Harris-Benedict equation and resting energy expenditure estimates in critically Ill ventilator patients. Am J Crit Care 2016;25:e21-e29.
Article
PubMed
51. Kruizenga HM, Hofsteenge GH, Weijs PJ. Predicting resting energy expenditure in underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese adult hospital patients. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2016;13:85.
PubMed
PMC
52. Vanhelst J, Hurdiel R, Mikulovic J, Bui-Xuân G, Fardy P, Theunynck D, Béghin L. Validation of the Vivago Wrist-Worn accelerometer in the assessment of physical activity. BMC Public Health 2012;12:690.
Article
PubMed
PMC
PDF
53. Weijs PJ. Validity of predictive equations for resting energy expenditure in US and Dutch overweight and obese class I and II adults aged 18–65 y. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88:959-970.
Article
PubMed
54. Neelemaat F. van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA, Thijs A, Seidell JC, Weijs PJ. Resting energy expenditure in malnourished older patients at hospital admission and three months after discharge: predictive equations versus measurements. Clin Nutr 2012;31:958-966.
PubMed
55. Crouter SE, Clowers KG, Bassett DR Jr. A novel method for using accelerometer data to predict energy expenditure. J Appl Physiol 1985;2006:1324-1331.
56. Broderick JM, Ryan J, O'Donnell DM, Hussey J. A guide to assessing physical activity using accelerometry in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2014;22:1121-1130.
Article
PubMed
PDF
57. John D, Freedson P. ActiGraph and Actical physical activity monitors: a peek under the hood. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012;44:S86-S89.
PubMed
PMC
58. Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Bassett DR Jr, O'Brien WL, King GA, Ainsworth BE. Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:S450-S456.
Article
PubMed
59. Yngve A, Nilsson A, Sjostrom M, Ekelund U. Effect of monitor placement and of activity setting on the MTI accelerometer output. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:320-326.
PubMed
60. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998;30:777-781.
Article
PubMed
61. Brooks AG, Gunn SM, Withers RT, Gore CJ, Plummer JL. Predicting walking METs and energy expenditure from speed or accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005;37:1216-1223.
Article
PubMed
62. Rothney MP, Brychta RJ, Meade NN, Chen KY, Buchowski MS. Validation of the ActiGraph two-regression model for predicting energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010;42:1785-1792.
Article
PubMed
PMC
63. Lyden K, Kozey SL, Staudenmeyer JW, Freedson PS. A comprehensive evaluation of commonly used accelerometer energy expenditure and MET prediction equations. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011;111:187-201.
PubMed
64. Santos-Lozano A, Santín-Medeiros F, Cardon G, Torres-Luque G, Bailón R, Bergmeir C, Ruiz JR, Lucia A, Garatachea N. Actigraph GT3X: validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points. Int J Sports Med 2013;34:975-982.
Article
PubMed
65. Sasaki JE, John D, Freedson PS. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport 2011;14:411-416.
Article
PubMed
66. Hills AP, Mokhtar N, Byrne NM. Assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure: an overview of objective measures. Front Nutr 2014;1:5.
Article
PubMed
PMC
67. Sirard JR, Pate RR. Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Sports Med 2001;31:439-454.
PubMed
68. Armstrong N. Young people's physical activity patterns as assessed by heart rate monitoring. J Sports Sci 1998;16(Suppl):S9-S16.
Article
PubMed
69. Schrack JA, Zipunnikov V, Goldsmith J, Bandeen-Roche K, Crainiceanu CM, Ferrucci L. Estimating energy expenditure from heart rate in older adults: a case for calibration. PLoS One 2014;9:e93520.
Article
PubMed
PMC
70. Ainslie P, Reilly T, Westerterp K. Estimating human energy expenditure: a review of techniques with particular reference to doubly labelled water. Sports Med 2003;33:683-698.
PubMed
71. Luke A, Maki KC, Barkey N, Cooper R, McGee D. Simultaneous monitoring of heart rate and motion to assess energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997;29:144-148.
PubMed
72. Montoye HJ, Kemper HC, Saris WH, Washburn RA. Measuring physical activity and energy expenditure. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 1996.
73. Ekelund U, Sjöström M, Yngve A, Nilsson A. Total daily energy expenditure and pattern of physical activity measured by minute-by-minute heart rate monitoring in 14–15 year old Swedish adolescents. Eur J Clin Nutr 2000;54:195-202.
Article
PubMed
PDF
74. Charlot K, Cornolo J, Borne R, Brugniaux JV, Richalet JP, Chapelot D, Pichon A. Improvement of energy expenditure prediction from heart rate during running. Physiol Meas 2014;35:253-266.
Article
PubMed
PDF
75. Giles D, Draper N, Neil W. Validity of the Polar V800 heart rate monitor to measure RR intervals at rest. Eur J Appl Physiol 2016;116:563-571.
Article
PubMed
PDF
76. Livingstone MB, Coward WA, Prentice AM, Davies PS, Strain JJ, McKenna PG, Mahoney CA, White JA, Stewart CM, Kerr MJ. Daily energy expenditure in free-living children: comparison of heart-rate monitoring with the doubly labeled water (²H₂¹⁸0) method. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;56:343-352.
PubMed
77. Brage S, Westgate K, Franks PW, Stegle O, Wright A, Ekelund U, Wareham NJ. Estimation of free-living energy expenditure by heart rate and movement sensing: a doubly-labelled water study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0137206.
Article
PubMed
PMC
78. Welk GJ, Differding JA, Thompson RW, Blair SN, Dziura J, Hart P. The utility of the Digi-walker step counter to assess daily physical activity patterns. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:S481-S488.
Article
PubMed
79. Crouter SE, Schneider PL, Karabulut M, Bassett DR Jr. Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:1455-1460.
Article
PubMed
80. Thorup CB, Grønkjær M, Spindler H, Andreasen JJ, Hansen J, Dinesen BI, Nielsen G, Sørensen EE. Pedometer use and self-determined motivation for walking in a cardiac telerehabilitation program: a qualitative study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2016;8:24.
PubMed
PMC
81. Finkelstein EA, Tan YT, Malhotra R, Lee CF, Goh SS, Saw SM. A cluster randomized controlled trial of an incentive-based outdoor physical activity program. J Pediatr 2013;163:167-172.e1.
Article
PubMed
82. Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in chronic disease. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2006;16(Suppl 1):3-63.
Article
PubMed
83. Ara I, Aparicio-Ugarriza R, Morales-Barco D, Nascimento de Souza W, Mata E, González-Gross M. Physical activity assessment in the general population; validated self-report methods. Nutr Hosp 2015;31(Suppl 3):211-218.
PubMed
84. Neilson HK, Robson PJ, Friedenreich CM, Csizmadi I. Estimating activity energy expenditure: how valid are physical activity questionnaires? Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87:279-291.
PubMed
85. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Mâsse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40:181-188.
Article
PubMed
86. Tucker JM, Welk GJ, Beyler NK. Physical activity in U.S.: adults compliance with the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Am J Prev Med 2011;40:454-461.
PubMed
87. Van Holle V, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Deforche B, Van Cauwenberg J, Van Dyck D. Assessment of physical activity in older Belgian adults: validity and reliability of an adapted interview version of the long International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-L). BMC Public Health 2015;15:433.
PubMed
PMC
88. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:1381-1395.
PubMed
89. Delshad M, Ghanbarian A, Ghaleh NR, Amirshekari G, Askari S, Azizi F. Reliability and validity of the modifiable activity questionnaire for an Iranian urban adolescent population. Int J Prev Med 2015;6:3.
Article
PubMed
PMC
90. Pettee Gabriel K, McClain JJ, Schmid KK, Storti KL, Ainsworth BE. Reliability and convergent validity of the past-week Modifiable Activity Questionnaire. Public Health Nutr 2011;14:435-442.
Article
PubMed
91. Golubic R, May AM, Benjaminsen Borch K, Overvad K, Charles MA, Diaz MJ, Amiano P, Palli D, Valanou E, Vigl M, Franks PW, Wareham N, Ekelund U, Brage S. Validity of electronically administered Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ) in ten European countries. PLoS One 2014;9:e92829.
Article
PubMed
PMC
92. Weston AT, Petosa R, Pate RR. Validation of an instrument for measurement of physical activity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997;29:138-143.
PubMed
93. Sylvia LG, Bernstein EE, Hubbard JL, Keating L, Anderson EJ. Practical guide to measuring physical activity. J Acad Nutr Diet 2014;114:199-208.
Article
PubMed
94. Troiano RP. Can there be a single best measure of reported physical activity? Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89:736-737.
Article
PubMed
PMC

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Expert perspectives on exposure-response functions for urban health policy: Lessons from a UBDPolicy workshop
Harry Williams, Zorana Jovanovic Andersen, Hanna Boogaard, Søren Brage, Matthew H.E.M. Browning, Samuel Cai, Xuan Chen, Priyanka deSouza, Angel M. Dzhambov, Benjamin Fenech, Gillian Flower, Francesco Forastiere, Leandro Garcia, Antonio Gasparrini, Ulrike
Environmental Research.2026; 288: 123150. CrossRef
Effect of Plant-Based Diets on Energy Metabolism and Metabolic Functions
Emine Karademir, Nilüfer Acar-Tek
Current Nutrition Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Laboratory comparison of consumer-grade and research-established wearables for monitoring heart rate, body temperature, and physical acitivity in sub-Saharan Africa
Stefan Mendt, Georgi Zout, Marco Rabuffetti, Hanns-Christian Gunga, Aditi Bunker, Sandra Barteit, Martina Anna Maggioni
Frontiers in Physiology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Metabolic Cost Reduction and Analysis of Assisted Walking Gait: A Review
Noor Abdul Kareem Shehab, Mahmud Rasheed Ismail
Al-Nahrain Journal for Engineering Sciences.2025; 28(3): 392. CrossRef
AI4Food, a feasibility study for the implementation of automated devices in the nutritional advice and follow up within a weight loss intervention
Blanca Lacruz-Pleguezuelos, Guadalupe X. Bazán, Sergio Romero-Tapiador, Gala Freixer, Ruben Tolosana, Roberto Daza, Cristina M. Fernández-Díaz, Susana Molina, María Carmen Crespo, Teresa Laguna, Laura Judith Marcos-Zambrano, Elena Aguilar-Aguilar, Jorge F
Clinical Nutrition.2025; 48: 80. CrossRef
From past to future: a review of methods for assessing physical activity energy expenditure
Xinmiao Zhang, Xiaoguang Gu, Miao Geng, Yuanyuan Hao, Kai Li, Tianpeng Yang, Yujun Cai
Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of non-exercise physical activity and exercise habits for preventing frailty among community-dwelling older adults: A 7-year follow-up from the Kashiwa cohort study
Weida Lyu, Tomoki Tanaka, Bo-Kyung Son, Yasuyo Yoshizawa, Katsuya Iijima
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics.2025; 131: 105769. CrossRef
Integrative Field-Based Health and Performance Research: A Narrative Review on Experimental Methods and Logistics to Conduct Competition and Training Camp Studies in Athletes
Trent Stellingwerff, Louise M. Burke, Hannah G. Caldwell, Robert J. Gathercole, Chris J. McNeil, Christopher Napier, Sarah A. Purcell, Susan Boegman, Elizabeth Johnson, Sharleen D. Hoar, Alexandra M. Coates, Erica V. Bennett, Alannah K. A. McKay, Ida. A.
Sports Medicine.2025; 55(6): 1377. CrossRef
Resting energy expenditure in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus: comparison between measured and predicted values
Asieh Mansour, Sara Ebrahimi Mousavi, Amirhossein Hemmati, Azita Hekmatdoost, Mostafa Qorbani, Hadis Gerami, Maryam Mirahmad, Mohammad Reza Mohajeri-Tehrani, Fatemeh Baradaran, Seyed Hossein Mirlohi, Sayed Mahmoud Sajjadi-Jazi
BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Total Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity Profiles Among Reindeer Herders and Office Workers of Northern Finland
Ville Stenbäck, Minna Turunen, Päivi Soppela, Karl‐Heinz Herzig, Cara Ocobock
American Journal of Human Biology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Association of non-exercise physical activity with sarcopenia compared with that of exercise habits among community-dwelling older adults: A 7-year follow-up from the Kashiwa Cohort Study
Weida Lyu, Tomoki Tanaka, Bo-Kyung Son, Yasuyo Yoshizawa, Katsuya Iijima
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus.2025; 2(3): 100188. CrossRef
Association between objective physical activity and frailty transition in community-dwelling prefrail Japanese older adults
Yu-Shan Lee, Yukiko Nishita, Chikako Tange, Shu Zhang, Hiroshi Shimokata, Shih-Yi Lin, Wei-Min Chu, Rei Otsuka
The Journal of nutrition, health and aging.2025; 29(4): 100519. CrossRef
Differences in Lifestyle-Related Behaviors Among Healthy Weight, Overweight, and Obese Groups: A Secondary Analysis of Data on 4714 Adults in Poland
Radosław Sierpiński, Mateusz Jankowski, Filip Raciborski
Nutrients.2025; 17(13): 2083. CrossRef
New insights into total and resting energy expenditure using state-of-the-art methods in cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study
Ana Paula Pagano, João Felipe Mota, Sarah A Purcell, Iasmin M Sousa, Hongyi Cai, Richard JE Skipworth, Tom Preston, Pierre Singer, Michael B Sawyer, Rajavel Elango, Peter J Walter, Carla M Prado
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.2025; 122(6): 1557. CrossRef
Physical activity and dose-characteristics in free-living conditions among patients awaiting coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a cross-sectional study
Sandra Dijkstra, Setayesh R. Tasbihgou, Iris Tigchelaar, Sawal D. Atmosoerodjo, Rolf Huet, Lucas H.V. van der Woude, Massimo A. Mariani, Anthony R. Absalom
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Association between the consumption of ultra-processed foods and generalized anxiety disorder in adults with obesity seeking weight loss
João Victor Laurindo dos Santos, Dafiny Rodrigues Silva, Samyra Araujo Monteiro de Carvalho, Débora Cavalcante Ferro, Rodrigo Tenório Lins Carnaúba, Natália Gomes da Silva Lopes, Mateus de Lima Macena, André Eduardo Silva Júnior, Ingrid Sofia Vieira de Me
Nutrire.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Employing an Artificial Intelligence Platform to Enhance Treatment Responses to GLP-1 Agonists by Utilizing Metabolic Variability Signatures Based on the Constrained Disorder Principle
Jakob Landau, Yariv Tiram, Yaron Ilan
Biomedicines.2025; 13(11): 2645. CrossRef
Is the ISO 8996:2021 heart rate method accurate for predicting metabolic rate? An experimental validation based on Chinese young adults
Siru Gao, Liu Yang, Shengkai Zhao, Shichao Liu, Hui Zhang, Yongchao Zhai
Building and Environment.2025; 282: 113235. CrossRef
Regulation of energy balance by leptin as an adiposity signal and modulator of the reward system
Roshanak Asgari, Maria Caceres-Valdiviezo, Sally Wu, Laurie Hamel, Bailey E. Humber, Sri Mahavir Agarwal, Paul J. Fletcher, Stephanie Fulton, Margaret K. Hahn, Sandra Pereira
Molecular Metabolism.2025; 91: 102078. CrossRef
Sports nutrition decoded: mechanistic perspectives on dietary components and athletic performance
Mukul Kumar, Deepika Kaushik, Harmandeep Kaur, Emel Oz, Vishal Kumar, Charalampos Proestos, Avinash Sharma, Hilal Kiziltunc Ozmen, Charles Brennan, Fatih Oz
International Journal of Food Science and Technology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Validity of self-assessment tools for cardiovascular risk behaviors: A systematic review
Wilhelmina F. Goevaerts, Joyce M. Heutinck, Mayke M.C.J. Van Leunen, Wessel W. Nieuwenhuys, Lonneke A. Fruytier, Cyrille Herkert, Jos J. Kraal, Ilse A.G. Rongen, Willem J. Kop, Yuan Lu, Hareld M.C. Kemps, Rutger W.M. Brouwers
American Journal of Preventive Cardiology.2025; 24: 101316. CrossRef
Utilizing applications Nutrihas Pro for calculated fluid and electrolyte requirements for patient.
Christine Rogahang, Nurpudji A TASLIM, Yasmin A SYAUKI, Agussalim BUKHARI, Aminuddin AMINUDDIN, Nur ASHARI
Nutrición Clínica y Dietética Hospitalaria.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Paving the way for improved action: how nuclear techniques can advance the assessment of malnutrition
Shruti P Shertukde, Ramya Padmanabha, Stephanie T Chung, Claire Gaudichon, Kerry S Jones, Paul Kelly, Nancy F Krebs, Anura Kurpad, Yvonne Lamers, Veronica Lopez-Teros, Alida Melse-Boonstra, Fatima C Pereira, Carla M Prado, Susan B Roberts, John Shepherd,
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.2025; 122(2): 646. CrossRef
Factors associated with bone health in long distance runners: a cross-sectional study
Ulrike H. Mitchell, Kelsey Clark, Savannah Nielsen, Patrick J. Owen
Osteoporosis International.2025; 36(9): 1607. CrossRef
Research Progress of Energy Metabolism Signaling Pathway in the Mechanism of Obesity
·热合曼江艾尔夏提
Advances in Clinical Medicine.2024; 14(03): 1214. CrossRef
Sex differences in physical functioning among older adults: cross-sectional results from the OUTDOOR ACTIVE study
Imke Stalling, Martin Gruber, Karin Bammann
BMC Public Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
‘An extra fight I didn't ask for’: A qualitative survey exploring the impact of calories on menus for people with experience of eating disorders
Tanya Frances, Kel O'Neill, Kirsty Newman
British Journal of Health Psychology.2024; 29(1): 20. CrossRef
The Chinese version of the physical activity questionnaire for adolescents: a psychometric validity, reliability, and invariance study
Ling Qin, Walter King Yan Ho, Selina Khoo
BMC Public Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The Relationship between Resting Metabolic Rate and Body Composition in People Living with Overweight and Obesity
Evdoxia Gitsi, Alexander Kokkinos, Sofia K. Konstantinidou, Sarantis Livadas, Georgia Argyrakopoulou
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(19): 5862. CrossRef
Longitudinal study on the impact of public health event control measures on physical fitness among Chinese adolescents: a southern city perspective
Chao Zhou, Aowei Zhang
BMC Public Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Scoping Review on the Interactive Digital Tools Used for the Physical and Cognitive Stimulation of Healthy Older Adults
Auriane Busser, Sylvain Fleury, Abdelmajid Kadri, Olfa Haj Mahmoud, Simon Richir, Tze Wei Liew
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Multimodal data-based human motion intention prediction using adaptive hybrid deep learning network for movement challenged person
Mustufa Haider Abidi
Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Relationship between sleep quality, sleep duration, heart rate, and step counts in young adults
Halime Arıkan, Alanur Kara
Turkish Journal of Kinesiology.2024; 10(4): 281. CrossRef
A literature review of biomarkers used for diagnosis of relative energy deficiency in sport
Kristýna Dvořáková, Ana Carolina Paludo, Adam Wagner, Dominik Puda, Marta Gimunová, Michal Kumstát
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Resting Energy Expenditure in Patients with Extreme Obesity: Comparison of the Harris–Benedict Equation with Indirect Calorimetry
Anna Jílková, Barbora Lampová, Ondřej Kádě, Lenka Kouřimská, Diana Chrpová, Iveta Kaiserová, Martin Matoulek
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(19): 5993. CrossRef
Análisis instrumental del movimiento
D. Pradon
EMC - Kinesiterapia - Medicina Física.2024; 45(3): 1. CrossRef
Estimation of Calorie Deficit (CD) by Assessing the Energy Parameters and Physical Activity Level (PAL) in Overweight Indian Women
Swapan Banerjee, Sulagna Ray Pal
FoodSci: Indian Journal of Research in Food Science and Nutrition.2024; : 37. CrossRef
Individually optimized estimation of energy expenditure in rescue workers using a tri-axial accelerometer and heart rate monitor
Hitomi Ogata, Yutaro Negishi, Nao Koizumi, Hisashi Nagayama, Miki Kaneko, Ken Kiyono, Naomi Omi
Frontiers in Physiology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Perturbation-based estimation of within-stride cycle metabolic cost
Alex C. Dzewaltowski, Prokopios Antonellis, Arash Mohammadzadeh Gonabadi, Seungmoon Song, Philippe Malcolm
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Total Daily Energy Expenditure is Overestimated by Dietary References Intake Equations Compared with Doubly Labeled Water in A Sample of Brazilian Adolescents
Lara Bérgamo Silva, Luiz Antonio dos Anjos, Meire Gallo Rosenburg, Natália Maira da Cruz Alves, Rutinéia de Fátima Micheletto, Eduardo Ferriolli, Karina Pfrimer, Derek Ball
International Journal of Nutrition.2024; 8(2): 1. CrossRef
Analisi strumentali del movimento
D. Pradon
EMC - Medicina Riabilitativa.2024; 31(3): 1. CrossRef
Determination of walking energy expenditure as an indicator of walking fatigue
Denys Kopytkov, Denys Ponkratov, Ganna Samchuk, Anton Yaruta, Nataliia Kitchenko
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.2024; 1376(1): 012035. CrossRef
The relationship between sleep- and circadian rhythm-related parameters with dietary practices and food intake of sedentary adults: a cross-sectional study
Ana Carolina Oumatu Magalhães, Camila Guazzelli Marques, Glaice Aparecida Lucin, Fernanda Patti Nakamoto, Sergio Tufik, Ronaldo Vagner Thomatieli-Santos, Marcus V. L. Dos Santos Quaresma
Sleep and Biological Rhythms.2024; 22(1): 113. CrossRef
Development and validation of novel equation for prediction of resting energy expenditure in active Saudi athletes
Mahmoud M.A. Abulmeaty, Ali Almajwal, Mervat Elsayed, Heba Hassan, Zaid Aldossari, Thamer Alsager
Medicine.2023; 102(52): e36826. CrossRef
The promoting effect of exercise motivation on physical fitness in college students: a mediation effect model
Yudu Liu, Xiaobing Zhai, Yanan Zhang, Can Jiang, Jing Zeng, Mei Yang, Xinyan Xie, Feng Zhou, Bing Xiang
BMC Public Health.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Quantifying energy expenditure in Göttingen Minipigs with the 13C-bicarbonate method under basal and drug-treated conditions
Simon K. Bredum, Anja V. Strathe, Julie Jacobsen, Berit Ø. Christoffersen, Matthias Gehre, Steffen Kümmel, Peter Junghans, Caroline Marcussen
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN.2023; 58: 388. CrossRef
Physical activity monitoring in Alzheimer’s disease during sport interventions: a multi-methodological perspective
Shari David, Christian Hohenfeld, Luisa Haberl, Jennifer Pahl, Ana S. Costa, Axel Kilders, Frank Hildebrand, Jörg B. Schulz, Kathrin Reetz, Alexa Haeger
Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
JoulesEye
Rishiraj Adhikary, Maite Sadeh, Nipun Batra, Mayank Goel
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies.2023; 7(4): 1. CrossRef
Dietary Temperature’s Influence on Energy Balance in Humans: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial and Crossover Design
Reza Rastmanesh, Kyle D Flack
JMIR Research Protocols.2023; 12: e42846. CrossRef
Validation of the 24-h perceived exertion recall survey in women in rural Tigray, Ethiopia
Jenna Golan, John F. Hoddinott
Current Developments in Nutrition.2023; 7(7): 100064. CrossRef
Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (short form) in adults with asthma
Joice Mara Oliveira, Thamyres Spositon, Diery Fernandes Rugila, Fabio Pitta, Karina Couto Furlanetto, Cosme F. Buzzachera
PLOS ONE.2023; 18(2): e0282137. CrossRef
The BREAK study protocol: Effects of intermittent energy restriction on adaptive thermogenesis during weight loss and its maintenance
Filipa M. Cortez, Catarina L. Nunes, Luís B. Sardinha, Analiza M. Silva, Vítor H. Teixeira, Vitor Barreto Paravidino
PLOS ONE.2023; 18(11): e0294131. CrossRef
Validity of Estimated Results from a Wearable Device for the Tests Time Up and Go and Sit to Stand in Young Adults and in People with Chronic Diseases
Kokouvi Geovani Agbohessou, Stephanie Sahuguede, Justine Lacroix, Fadel Hamdan, Emmanuel Conchon, Yannick Dumas, Anne Julien-Vergonjanne, Stephane Mandigout
Sensors.2023; 23(12): 5742. CrossRef
ARTE index revisited: linking biomarkers of cardiometabolic health with free-living physical activity in postmenopausal women
Stephen J. Carter, Marissa N. Baranauskas, Harshvardhan Singh, Catia Martins, Gary R. Hunter
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology.2022; 322(4): R292. CrossRef
Changes in Physical Health‐Related Indexes of Chinese College Students before and after COVID‐19 Lockdown
Donglin Hu, Zhiyun Liu, He Zhang, Chen Jiang, Italo F. Angelillo
BioMed Research International.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Investigation of movement-related behaviors and energy compensation in people living with liver disease: A scoping review
Carminda Goersch Lamboglia, Ashley P. Mccurdy, Yeong-Bae Kim, Cliff Lindeman, Amie J. Mangan, Allison Sivak, Diana Mager, John C. Spence
Journal of Sports Sciences.2022; 40(12): 1299. CrossRef
Wearable Piezoelectric Airflow Transducers for Human Respiratory and Metabolic Monitoring
Lu Jin, Zekun Liu, Mucahit Altintas, Yan Zheng, Zhangchi Liu, Sirui Yao, Yangyang Fan, Yi Li
ACS Sensors.2022; 7(8): 2281. CrossRef
Operation complexity as one of the injury factors of coal miners
Serhii Nehrii, Tetiana Nehrii, Serhii Volkov, Yevgen Zbykovskyy, Iryna Shvets
Mining of Mineral Deposits.2022; 16(2): 95. CrossRef
Lack of validity of free-living physical activity energy expenditure estimated from ActiGraph equations in severely obese women: A doubly labelled water study
Anna Gabriela Silva Vilela Ribeiro, Alex Harley Crisp, Michele Novaes Ravelli, Maria Rita Marques de Oliveira, Rozangela Verlengia
Journal of Sports Sciences.2022; 40(14): 1552. CrossRef
A Review on Computer Vision Technology for Physical Exercise Monitoring
Salik Ram Khanal, Dennis Paulino, Jaime Sampaio, Joao Barroso, Arsénio Reis, Vitor Filipe
Algorithms.2022; 15(12): 444. CrossRef
The Effect of an Active Upper-Limb Exoskeleton on Metabolic Parameters and Muscle Activity During a Repetitive Industrial Task
Andrea Blanco, Jose M. Catalan, David Martinez, Jose V. Garcia-Perez, Nicolas Garcia-Aracil
IEEE Access.2022; 10: 16479. CrossRef
Energy intake, expenditure and balance, and factors associated with energy balance of young adults (20–39 years): a retrospective cross-sectional community-based cohort study
Rufina N. B. Ayogu, Hannah Oshomegie, Elizabeth A. Udenta
BMC Nutrition.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Energy Expenditure Estimation of Tabata by Combining Acceleration and Heart Rate
Yiping Yan, Qingguo Chen
Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
How Do We Assess Energy Availability and RED-S Risk Factors in Para Athletes?
Kristin L. Jonvik, Birna Vardardottir, Elizabeth Broad
Nutrients.2022; 14(5): 1068. CrossRef
Exercise load and physical activity intensity in relation to dystonia and choreoathetosis during powered wheelchair mobility in children and youth with dyskinetic cerebral palsy
Saranda Bekteshi, Ioana Gabriela Nica, Sotirios Gakopoulos, Marco Konings, Rozanne Maes, Benoit Cuyvers, Jean-Marie Aerts, Hans Hallez, Elegast Monbaliu
Disability and Rehabilitation.2022; 44(17): 4794. CrossRef
Perspective: Opportunities and Challenges of Technology Tools in Dietary and Activity Assessment: Bridging Stakeholder Viewpoints
Sai Krupa Das, Akari J Miki, Caroline M Blanchard, Edward Sazonov, Cheryl H Gilhooly, Sujit Dey, Colton B Wolk, Chor San H Khoo, James O Hill, Robin P Shook
Advances in Nutrition.2022; 13(1): 1. CrossRef
The Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Parent and Child Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity and Body Mass Index
Samantha Donnelly, Duncan S. Buchan, Gillian McLellan, Rosie Arthur
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport.2022; 93(4): 758. CrossRef
Leisure sedentary time and physical activity are higher in neighbourhoods with denser greenness and better built environments: an analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
Irmina Klicnik, John David Cullen, Dany Doiron, Caroline Barakat, Chris I. Ardern, David Rudoler, Shilpa Dogra
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism.2022; 47(3): 278. CrossRef
Energy cost of walking in older adults: accuracy of the ActiGraph accelerometer predictive equations
Didace Ndahimana, Ye-Jin Kim, Cui-Sang Wang, Eun-Kyung Kim
Nutrition Research and Practice.2022; 16(5): 565. CrossRef
The Role and Regulatory Mechanism of Brown Adipose Tissue Activation in Diet-Induced Thermogenesis in Health and Diseases
Pei-Chi Chan, Po-Shiuan Hsieh
International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(16): 9448. CrossRef
Interventions associated with brown adipose tissue activation and the impact on energy expenditure and weight loss: A systematic review
Luis C. Perez, Laura T. Perez, Yash Nene, Guillermo E. Umpierrez, Georgia M. Davis, Francisco J. Pasquel
Frontiers in Endocrinology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Relationship between vigorous physical activity and health care costs among adolescents: ABCD Growth Study
Wésley Torres, Lucas Gabriel de Moraes Chagas, Rômulo Araújo Fernandes, Monique Yndawe Castanho Araujo, Jacqueline Bexiga Urban, Santiago Maillane-Vanegas, Bruna Camilo Turi-Lynch, Jamile Sanches Codogno, Nana Kwame Anokye
BMC Pediatrics.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Systematic review of accelerometer-based methods for 24-h physical behavior assessment in young children (0–5 years old)
Annelinde Lettink, Teatske M. Altenburg, Jelle Arts, Vincent T. van Hees, Mai J. M. Chinapaw
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Associations between socioeconomic status and physical activity among older adults: cross-sectional results from the OUTDOOR ACTIVE study
Imke Stalling, Birte Marie Albrecht, Linda Foettinger, Carina Recke, Karin Bammann
BMC Geriatrics.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Ergonomic risk and physiological assessment of plogging activity
Rahul Raghavan, Vinay V Panicker, Francis J. Emmatty
Work.2022; 72(4): 1337. CrossRef
Using Computer Vision to Track Facial Color Changes and Predict Heart Rate
Salik Ram Khanal, Jaime Sampaio, Juliana Exel, Joao Barroso, Vitor Filipe
Journal of Imaging.2022; 8(9): 245. CrossRef
A Comparison of the Indirect Calorimetry and Different Energy Equations for the Determination of Resting Energy Expenditure of Patients With Renal Transplantation
Nilüfer Acar Tek, Gamze Yurtdaş, Özge Cemali, Ayşe Derya Bayazıt, Özge Mengi Çelik, Gizem Özata Uyar, Burcu Deniz Güneş, Burak Özbaş, Yasemin Erten
Journal of Renal Nutrition.2021; 31(3): 296. CrossRef
Persistent Poor Health after COVID-19 Is Not Associated with Respiratory Complications or Initial Disease Severity
Liam Townsend, Joanne Dowds, Kate O’Brien, Grainne Sheill, Adam H. Dyer, Brendan O’Kelly, John P. Hynes, Aoife Mooney, Jean Dunne, Cliona Ni Cheallaigh, Cliona O’Farrelly, Nollaig M. Bourke, Niall Conlon, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Colm Bergin, Parthiban Nad
Annals of the American Thoracic Society.2021; 18(6): 997. CrossRef
Body composition helps: Differences in energy expenditure between pregnant and nonpregnant females
Olalla Prado‐Nóvoa, Jesús Rodríguez, Adrián Martín García, Ana Mateos
American Journal of Human Biology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Association between physical activity and mortality in end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review of observational studies
Pedro Martins, Elisa A. Marques, Diogo V. Leal, Aníbal Ferreira, Kenneth R Wilund, João L. Viana
BMC Nephrology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Using Kinect body joint detection system to predict energy expenditures during physical activities
Bereket H. Woldegiorgis, Chiuhsiang J. Lin, Riotaro Sananta
Applied Ergonomics.2021; 97: 103540. CrossRef
Effect of Exercise Training on Fat Loss—Energetic Perspectives and the Role of Improved Adipose Tissue Function and Body Fat Distribution
Kristoffer Jensen Kolnes, Maria Houborg Petersen, Teodor Lien-Iversen, Kurt Højlund, Jørgen Jensen
Frontiers in Physiology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Modeling Energy Expenditure Estimation in Occupational Context by Actigraphy: A Multi Regression Mixed-Effects Model
André Lucena, Joana Guedes, Mário Vaz, Luiz Silva, Denisse Bustos, Erivaldo Souza
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(19): 10419. CrossRef
Estimating Total Energy Expenditure for Fire-Fighters during Large Scale Disaster Response Training Using a Tri-Axial Accelerometer
Nao Koizumi, Yutaro Negishi, Hitomi Ogata, Randeep Rakwal, Naomi Omi
Nutrients.2021; 13(8): 2789. CrossRef
Human activity recognition based on machine learning classification of smartwatch accelerometer dataset
Dušan Radivojević, Nikola Mirkov, Slobodan Maletić
FME Transactions.2021; 49(1): 225. CrossRef
Prediction of non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) using multiple linear regression in healthy Korean adults: a preliminary study
Won-Sang Jung, Hun-Young Park, Sung-Woo Kim, Jisu Kim, Hyejung Hwang, Kiwon Lim
Physical Activity and Nutrition.2021; 25(1): 23. CrossRef
Nutrition Considerations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Austin Lin, Dejan Micic
Nutrition in Clinical Practice.2021; 36(2): 298. CrossRef
The Validity of MotionSense HRV in Estimating Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity under Free-Living and Simulated Activity Settings
Sunku Kwon, Neng Wan, Ryan D. Burns, Timothy A. Brusseau, Youngwon Kim, Santosh Kumar, Emre Ertin, David W. Wetter, Cho Y. Lam, Ming Wen, Wonwoo Byun
Sensors.2021; 21(4): 1411. CrossRef
Challenges in tackling energy expenditure as obesity therapy: From preclinical models to clinical application
Mona C. Löffler, Matthias J. Betz, Denis P. Blondin, Robert Augustin, Anand K. Sharma, Yu-Hua Tseng, Camilla Scheele, Heike Zimdahl, Michael Mark, Anita M. Hennige, Christian Wolfrum, Wolfgang Langhans, Bradford S. Hamilton, Heike Neubauer
Molecular Metabolism.2021; 51: 101237. CrossRef
Relationship between Arterial Stiffness and Physical Activity Level Assessed by International Physical Activity Questionnaireshort form (IPAQSF) in the Elderly
Hyun-Ju Lee, Ji-Yeon Gwak, Ha-Yeon Jun, Eun-Kyung Kim
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2020; 25(3): 236. CrossRef
Validity of Accelerometers for the Evaluation of Energy Expenditure in Obese and Overweight Individuals: A Systematic Review
Silvia Pisanu, Andrea Deledda, Andrea Loviselli, Inge Huybrechts, Fernanda Velluzzi
Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism.2020; 2020: 1. CrossRef
Assessing the validity and reliability and determining cut-points of the Actiwatch 2 in measuring physical activity
Chadley Kemp, Paula R Pienaar, Rob H P Henst, Laura C Roden, Tracy L Kolbe-Alexander, Dale E Rae
Physiological Measurement.2020; 41(8): 085001. CrossRef
Feasibility of Measuring Sedentary Time Using Data From a Thigh-Worn Accelerometer
Mark Hamer, Emmanuel Stamatakis, Sebastien Chastin, Natalie Pearson, Matt Brown, Emily Gilbert, Alice Sullivan
American Journal of Epidemiology.2020; 189(9): 963. CrossRef
Vascular Structure and Function in Children and Adolescents: What Impact Do Physical Activity, Health-Related Physical Fitness, and Exercise Have?
Lisa Baumgartner, Heidi Weberruß, Renate Oberhoffer-Fritz, Thorsten Schulz
Frontiers in Pediatrics.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Validity and Reliability of a Single Question for Leisure-Time Physical Activity Assessment in Middle-Aged Women
Matti Hyvärinen, Sarianna Sipilä, Janne Kulmala, Harto Hakonen, Tuija H. Tammelin, Urho M. Kujala, Vuokko Kovanen, Eija K. Laakkonen
Journal of Aging and Physical Activity.2020; 28(2): 231. CrossRef
Estimating energy expenditure of head-hauling water and grain grinding from heart rate monitor measurements in northern Mozambique
Kory C Russel, Matthew P Buman, Jennifer Davis, William L Haskell
Public Health Nutrition.2020; 23(16): 2886. CrossRef
The Effect of the Ultra-Marathon Run at a Distance of 100 Kilometers on the Concentration of Selected Adipokines in Adult Men
Anna Czajkowska, Jadwiga Ambroszkiewicz, Anna Mróz, Katarzyna Witek, Dariusz Nowicki, Łukasz Małek
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(12): 4289. CrossRef
Thigh-worn accelerometry for measuring movement and posture across the 24-hour cycle: a scoping review and expert statement
Matthew L Stevens, Nidhi Gupta, Elif Inan Eroglu, Patrick Joseph Crowley, Barbaros Eroglu, Adrian Bauman, Malcolm Granat, Leon Straker, Peter Palm, Sari Stenholm, Mette Aadahl, Paul Mork, Sebastien Chastin, Vegar Rangul, Mark Hamer, Annemarie Koster, Andr
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine.2020; 6(1): e000874. CrossRef
Nutrition for Female Soccer Players—Recommendations
Hubert Dobrowolski, Aleksandra Karczemna, Dariusz Włodarek
Medicina.2020; 56(1): 28. CrossRef
Assessment of Physical Activity in Adults: A Review of Validated Questionnaires From a Nutritionist’s Point of View
Angela Patricia Bacelis-Rivero, Anabel Vázquez-Rodríguez, Claudia E. Carrasco-Legleu, Lidia G. De León, Sandra Alicia Reza-López
Evaluation & the Health Professions.2020; 43(4): 235. CrossRef
“Investigation of weight reduction and atherogenic features in response to aquafit among sedentary, obese middle-aged males”
Mohammadreza Rezaeipour
Obesity Medicine.2020; 18: 100227. CrossRef
Objective and Subjective Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Overhead Work
Pauline Maurice, Jernej Camernik, Dasa Gorjan, Benjamin Schirrmeister, Jonas Bornmann, Luca Tagliapietra, Claudia Latella, Daniele Pucci, Lars Fritzsche, Serena Ivaldi, Jan Babic
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.2020; 28(1): 152. CrossRef
Device-assessed physical activity and sedentary behavior in a community-based cohort of older adults
Dori Rosenberg, Rod Walker, Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman, John Bellettiere, Yunhua Xiang, KatieRose Richmire, Michael Higgins, David Wing, Eric B. Larson, Paul K. Crane, Andrea Z. LaCroix
BMC Public Health.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
The Effects of Upper-Body Exoskeletons on Human Metabolic Cost and Thermal Response during Work Tasks—A Systematic Review
Simona Del Ferraro, Tiziana Falcone, Alberto Ranavolo, Vincenzo Molinaro
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(20): 7374. CrossRef
Concurrent validity and reliability of 3-day physical activity recall on daily energy expenditure in children and adolescents
Vinicius Oliveira Damasceno, Jorge Roberto Perrout Lima, Reginaldo Gonçalves, Jeferson Macedo Vianna, Francisco Zacaron Werneck, Paulo Roberto Amorin, Dalton Lima-Júnior, Joel Alves Lamounier
Human Movement.2020; 22(2): 93. CrossRef
Comparison of the Physical Activity Frequency Questionnaire (PAFQ) with accelerometry in a middle-aged and elderly population: The CoLaus study
Sanne Verhoog, Cédric Gubelmann, Idris Guessous, Arjola Bano, Oscar H. Franco, Pedro Marques-Vidal
Maturitas.2019; 129: 68. CrossRef
Psychometric Testing of the CHAMPS Questionnaire in French Canadians with COPD
Susanne Mak, Jean Bourbeau, Nancy E. Mayo, Sharon Wood-Dauphinee, Judith E. Soicher
Canadian Respiratory Journal.2019; 2019: 1. CrossRef
The use of whole body calorimetry to compare measured versus predicted energy expenditure in postpartum women
Leticia C R Pereira, Sarah A Purcell, Sarah A Elliott, Linda J McCargar, Rhonda C Bell, Paula J Robson, Carla M Prado
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.2019; 109(3): 554. CrossRef
Contribution of Physical Education to the Daily Physical Activity of Schoolchildren in Saudi Arabia
Osama Aljuhani, Gavin Sandercock
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2019; 16(13): 2397. CrossRef
Amounts of physical activity and sedentary behavior patterns in older adults: using an accelerometer and a physical activity diary
Na-Young Go, Didace Ndahimana, Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal of Nutrition and Health.2019; 52(1): 36. CrossRef
Quantification de l’activité physique par l’accélérométrie
J. Vanhelst
Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique.2019; 67(2): 126. CrossRef
Validity of the dietary reference intakes for determining energy requirements in older adults
Didace Ndahimana, Na-Young Go, Kazuko Ishikawa-Takata, Jonghoon Park, Eun-Kyung Kim
Nutrition Research and Practice.2019; 13(3): 256. CrossRef
Metabolism, bioenergetics and thermal physiology: influences of the human intestinal microbiota
Lawrence E. Armstrong, Douglas J. Casa, Luke N. Belval
Nutrition Research Reviews.2019; 32(2): 205. CrossRef
A Systematic Review of Technology-Driven Methodologies for Estimation of Energy Intake
Abul Doulah, Megan A. Mccrory, Janine A. Higgins, Edward Sazonov
IEEE Access.2019; 7: 49653. CrossRef
Measurement of physical activity in clinical practice and research: advances in cancer and chronic respiratory disease
Matthew Maddocks, Catherine L. Granger
Current Opinion in Supportive & Palliative Care.2018; 12(3): 219. CrossRef
Exploring the Delay Factors of Integrated Energy Project by Dynamic Green (Pvt.) Limited
Abdullah Farooq Ansari, Muhammad Haseeb Ahmad, Afia Mushtaq
Organization Theory Review.2018; 2(2): 41. CrossRef
Validity of predictive equations for resting energy expenditure in Korean non-obese adults
Didace Ndahimana, Yeon-Jung Choi, Jung-Hye Park, Mun-Jeong Ju, Eun-Kyung Kim
Nutrition Research and Practice.2018; 12(4): 283. CrossRef
Technology Innovations in Dietary Intake and Physical Activity Assessment: Challenges and Recommendations for Future Directions
David M. Klurfeld, Eric B. Hekler, Camille Nebeker, Kevin Patrick, Chor San H. Khoo
American Journal of Preventive Medicine.2018; 55(4): e117. CrossRef
Dietary and Physical Activity Outcomes Determine Energy Balance in U.S. Adults Aged 50–74 Years
Mindy Patterson, Wanyi Wang, Alexis Ortiz
Journal of Aging and Physical Activity.2018; 26(4): 561. CrossRef
Monitoring Energy Expenditure Using a Multi-Sensor Device—Applications and Limitations of the SenseWear Armband in Athletic Populations
Karsten Koehler, Clemens Drenowatz
Frontiers in Physiology.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of Physical Activity Level, Physical Activity Pattern and Energy Expenditure in Male and Female Elementary School Soccer Players using Accelerometer and Physical Activity Diary
Hae-Sun An, Su-Ji Choi, Mo-Ran Lee, Jung-Sook Lee, Eun-Kyung Kim
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2017; 22(6): 529. CrossRef
Validation of dietary reference intake equations for estimating energy requirements in Korean adults by using the doubly labeled water method
Eun-Kyung Kim, Jae-Hee Kim, Myung-Hee Kim, Didace Ndahimana, Seo-Eun Yean, Jin-Sook Yoon, Jung-Hyun Kim, Jonghoon Park, Kazuko Ishikawa-Takata
Nutrition Research and Practice.2017; 11(4): 300. CrossRef

Cite

CITE

export

Copy Download

Format
XML Download

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Measurement Methods for Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure: a Review

Clin Nutr Res. 2017;6(2):68-80. Published online April 28, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7762/cnr.2017.6.2.68

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
bib — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Measurement Methods for Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure: a Review

Clin Nutr Res. 2017;6(2):68-80. Published online April 28, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7762/cnr.2017.6.2.68

Measurement Methods for Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure: a Review

Table 1 Advantages and limitations of different methods for physical activity and energy expenditure measurement

DLW, doubly labeled water; TEE, total energy expenditure.

Articles

Page Path

Measurement Methods for Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure: a Review

Full Article

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION

Advantages and limitations of different methods for physical activity and energy expenditure measurement

COMPONENTS OF TEE

DOUBLY LABELED WATER (DLW) METHOD

DIRECT CALORIMETRY

INDIRECT CALORIMETRY

ACCELEROMETRY

HEART RATE MONITOR

PEDOMETRY

SELF-REPORT METHODS

CONCLUSION

NOTES

REFERENCES

Figure & Data

References

Citations

CITE

Download Citation

Format:

Include:

Table 1

ABOUT

BROWSE ARTICLES

EDITORIAL POLICIES

FOR CONTRIBUTORS